I’m not teaching this fall, which after more than 23 years at the University of Colorado is a bit of a strange feeling. Actually, that is not quite right — I’m not teaching in the classroom this fall, but I am still teaching. With THB approaching 30,000 subscribers in 153 countries, I am aware every day of the responsibility that comes with this amazing platform.
Today, as another experiment in innovation here at THB, I offer a collated reader’s guide to three THB series published in recent years on extreme weather and climate. Think of it as a syllabus. Together, along with associated readings and contrary points of view, these 20 posts would serve as a nice basis for a unique, content-rich college or grad school course.1 More generally, the collection offers a perspective on weather and climate extremes that I’m pretty sure you will not find anywhere else.
I’ll hold live “office hours” via Substack Chat (which you can find on the header of the THB home page) on Wednesday 4 September — 7am Boulder, 3pm Berlin, 6:30pm Bengaluru, 11pm Brisbane), and will focus on discussing Module 1 below. Look for a prompt from me via Chat opening up the discussion thread on Wednesday. I’ll plan on subsequent chats on the other modules in coming weeks. You are also invited to participate in the comments below, where I’ll be active.
Meantime, please bookmark this post. It is September and class is in!
Module 1: What the IPCC AR6 Really Says About Extreme Weather and Climate?
Module 2: Making Sense of the Economics of Extreme Weather and Climate
Normalization example 1: Extreme Events in Europe, 1995-2019
What the peer-reviewed literature says about normalized losses
Module 3: Extreme Event Case Studies
There are many such syllabi that might be collated from THB posts over the past years — including, energy policies, decarbonization policies, climate adaptation, science integrity, the media and climate, the climate wars — and that is just for climate. In the comments below please let me know the collations you’d like down the road. I can envision all sorts of possibilities, such as Zoom lectures/discussions, and of course, I welcome your suggestions — Let’s see how this goes.
A final point for today — I welcome (indeed, invite) experts who think I have gotten things wrong or incomplete in these series to let me and THB readers know, to share your views, and to engage in an exchange of views.2 Remember, science is self-correcting and honest brokering is a group effort.
The work here at THB is an experiment in independent research and analysis that depends upon the support of its readers and participants. Please consider subscribing and sharing. If you are already a subscriber, please consider upgrading to join the ranks of paid subscribers who make THB possible. To THB paid subscribers — Thank you!
This gives me a good opportunity to extend my usual fall offer — If you teach and you’d like me to beam into your course to guest lecture, just be in touch. This offer is also available as a “break glass in case of emergency” for faculty feeling overwhelmed or just need a day off teaching — I am happy to help.
Feel free to enter comments directly on this post, and for those not paid subscribers, just email me and I will be happy to do so on your behalf. With a critical mass of critique, I am happy to do a dedicated post as well.
Mr. Pielke,
I not only subscribe to THB but also to Irrational Fear by Mr. Wielicki. One of his recent posts states “If natural variability and cloud feedbacks remain poorly understood, can we justify radical shifts in energy policy and economic structure based on models that may be oversimplifying or misrepresenting complex climate dynamics?” It would be interesting if you would address this and other ideas and inferences in that post. Thank you.
https://irrationalfear.substack.com/p/unsettled-science-are-we-really-measuring
Roger, although not part of the class agenda, I would like to see a discussion on the effectiveness of proposed forms of CO2 mitigation: carbon tax/tax credits, carbon sequestration (biologic--forests/plants and geologic, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). I recently saw an article about direct air capture of CO2 by factories and the article makes some detailed claims of efficiency (157 factories equals CO2 capture of 3 billion trees). I had not even heard of this capability before, so I wonder if this is more smoke and mirrors: https://www.oerproject.com/OER-Materials/OER-Media/Images/Climate/Unit-4/Vacuum-the-Sky?share=embed&fromlesson=true