I notice from the website that the Bank of England has membership of this organisation. The former Governor is now employed by WEF and while still at the BOE was already spouting such policy.
I think your post needs wider knowledge in the UK so that the new government knows the sort of nonsense scenarios the Bank of England may be pushing in the UK.
Here is the real number of expected damage from human generated co2 for the next 100 years: $0.00. Any 'damage' from co2 will always be so much less than the improved quality of life thanks to fossil fuels that the magnitude becomes completely insignificant, ie 0 in any reasonable equation.
I notice from the website that the Bank of England has membership of this organisation. The former Governor is now employed by WEF and while still at the BOE was already spouting such policy.
I think your post needs wider knowledge in the UK so that the new government knows the sort of nonsense scenarios the Bank of England may be pushing in the UK.
So what do the "Honest Brokers" do about this? An editorial in the WSJ?
Roger, are these analyses peer reviewed or subject to any formal review process?
Here is the real number of expected damage from human generated co2 for the next 100 years: $0.00. Any 'damage' from co2 will always be so much less than the improved quality of life thanks to fossil fuels that the magnitude becomes completely insignificant, ie 0 in any reasonable equation.