6 Comments

You will eventually discover that there is no middle ground. Either you support taking sports from females and giving them to male-bodied people, or you support the LGBTAlphabet agenda 110% without exception.

Human reproductive biology is not a construction. You don't call the sunset a "construction," you construct the word "sunset" to mark the phenomenon. The world is made of stuff, not words. We are made of blood and meat and bone, not words. Nature does not give a damn what words we use to mark or describe its properties. Male and female bodies are the result of human evolution as a sexually dimorphic species. No amount of "construction" is ever going to make male bodies in female sports fair, ever.

You will have to choose one or the other. The lines are drawn. You are standing in no man's land -- "neither hot nor cold, I spit you out of my mouth."

Expand full comment

Sorry but I'm impatient waiting for part 2!

Expand full comment

Good start to the discussion, Roger.

A major concern of mine is that transgender (male to female) athletes have the advantage of years of elevated male hormones that have built bone and muscle mass. Should they be able to compete with those who have not have this advantage? How would we regard a female who had taken testosterone in her formative years, but was now drug free?

Expand full comment