Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frank Paynter's avatar

Nice post - and really clean! I could come up with only one small nit:

"which instead claimed the opposite contrary to the evidence and peer-reviewed research:"

should be

"which instead claimed the opposite - contrary to the evidence and peer-reviewed research:"

this is like the joke about commas saving lives - the difference between

"Let's eat Gramma" and "Let's eat, Gramma"

Frank

Expand full comment
Max More's avatar

For many readers it would be helpful to explain how normalization works. Otherwise, they might worry that it is distorting rather than clarifying the facts. More power to you for so ably conveying all the information you do.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts