I'm not sure, McCarthy didn't have unnamed billionaires paying his legal battles.
Thats another thing i don't get, we aren't supposed to let dark money corrupt and influence elections, isn't the judicial system just as important? If Piltdown is trying to game the system using anonymous money, shouldn't that be exposed?
Aren't we better off if all the cockroaches are exposed to the disinfection of light?
I don't remember the Mccarthy hearings well enough to know about his money. He did have the FBI behind him, and his arrogance certainly is in the same league as Mann's.
What bothers me most is the censorship that comes from an atmosphere of fear. Bullying, ad hominem, litigation, they are all censorship in one form or another.
However you slice it, it is a very sad state of affairs.
“ Mark Steyn and Simberg compared him to Jerry Sandusky”
That is Mann’s mischaracterization of it.
In reality they compared his treatment by the university to how it treated Sandusky, with coverups and bullying, and they were 100% right.
Almost certainly that $1mil award will be thrown out but we’ll never hear that in the MSM.
All we’ll hear is Piltdown Mann won.
Same as in the Tim Ball case, Piltdown failed to defend the indefensible and so he “won”.
Purely a SLAPP case same as the recent one
You are totally correct. Even then, don't yiu think the comparison to McCarthy is more appropriate?
I'm not sure, McCarthy didn't have unnamed billionaires paying his legal battles.
Thats another thing i don't get, we aren't supposed to let dark money corrupt and influence elections, isn't the judicial system just as important? If Piltdown is trying to game the system using anonymous money, shouldn't that be exposed?
Aren't we better off if all the cockroaches are exposed to the disinfection of light?
I don't remember the Mccarthy hearings well enough to know about his money. He did have the FBI behind him, and his arrogance certainly is in the same league as Mann's.
What bothers me most is the censorship that comes from an atmosphere of fear. Bullying, ad hominem, litigation, they are all censorship in one form or another.
However you slice it, it is a very sad state of affairs.
If this is not changed it will destroy science for a generation.
Why would anyone believe anything from "science".
Just one more institution destroyed by the communists, for lack of a better word.