Dr Pielke seems to be misinterpreting the answers to a badly worded question.
As Clayton Oberg notes, the question is about trust in scientists, not trust in science. The responses may simply reflect the well-known tribalism of current US politics: scientists tend to be supporters of the Democrat party, and so Republican supporters (especially the white, less-educated Trump base) do not trust them to act in the public interest. That is not very interesting, and not a problem about science in particular.
But there is another problem, with the question itself. Science is a method of trying to discover how the universe works. A good scientist will advance our understanding. But her obligation is not to act in the "best interests of the public", whatever that is, but to act so as to discover and tell us the truth about the universe. Whether that is in the public interest depends entirely on what we consider the public interest to be.
So, Pew has asked the wrong question, and Dr Pielke has misinterpreted the results.
In interpreting this pole you must be careful not to confuse confidence in "scientists" with confidence in "science". I am a retired scientist who's become increasingly dismayed with researchers who take a particular position on a problem where much remains unknown and claim those with a different position are denying science.
The shaming and controlling hive mind is powerful, Roger should know, having been cancelled himself. Scientific method is badly damaged everywhere, and especially by the pharmaceutical industry. I recall the brouhaha over not releasing data in climate science. How can one replicate a study, or falsify it, with no actual data?
At least Roger didn't capitalize "science", lol. Republicans, by virtue of so many MSM narratives being blatant untruths, have developed better bullsh*t detectors.
Dr Pielke seems to be misinterpreting the answers to a badly worded question.
As Clayton Oberg notes, the question is about trust in scientists, not trust in science. The responses may simply reflect the well-known tribalism of current US politics: scientists tend to be supporters of the Democrat party, and so Republican supporters (especially the white, less-educated Trump base) do not trust them to act in the public interest. That is not very interesting, and not a problem about science in particular.
But there is another problem, with the question itself. Science is a method of trying to discover how the universe works. A good scientist will advance our understanding. But her obligation is not to act in the "best interests of the public", whatever that is, but to act so as to discover and tell us the truth about the universe. Whether that is in the public interest depends entirely on what we consider the public interest to be.
So, Pew has asked the wrong question, and Dr Pielke has misinterpreted the results.
In interpreting this pole you must be careful not to confuse confidence in "scientists" with confidence in "science". I am a retired scientist who's become increasingly dismayed with researchers who take a particular position on a problem where much remains unknown and claim those with a different position are denying science.
The shaming and controlling hive mind is powerful, Roger should know, having been cancelled himself. Scientific method is badly damaged everywhere, and especially by the pharmaceutical industry. I recall the brouhaha over not releasing data in climate science. How can one replicate a study, or falsify it, with no actual data?
At least Roger didn't capitalize "science", lol. Republicans, by virtue of so many MSM narratives being blatant untruths, have developed better bullsh*t detectors.