On this episode, Nate is joined by climate and policy scientist Roger Pielke Jr. to discuss the progression of climate research and modeling. The climate activist community is based around projections of what a future might look like given the actions of society - an important tool in the push for urgent climate action. Yet, just like with any other model, the assumptions and parameters can greatly shape the outcomes. How has climate science been shaped by previous models and public perception? How did 2Cº come to be our common climate goal post? Are we anticipating the future within the most likely range of possibilities, or are we polarizing ourselves to the extremes of climate denial and climate doom?
For those who prefer to read, I’m happy to share the transcript provided by Nate, here in PDF. Show notes and more here.
THB is reader supported. Please subscribe at any level and share with friends and family. Issues where science meets politics have never been more important, and so too independent research, analyses and reporting. Thanks for your support!
You missed the opportunity to disabuse Nate of the notion that climate change is an existential problem.
It's discussions like this that I miss most from my time at CU as both a grad student and instructor. Thanks, Roger for creating and producing The Honest Broker as it keeps me engaged and mentally sharp. I've shared this video with my family and close friends.