The Honest Broker

Share this post

The Politics of Climate Science

rogerpielkejr.substack.com

Discover more from The Honest Broker

Making sense of science, policy and politics
Over 17,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

The Politics of Climate Science

My Conversation with US Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX)

Roger Pielke Jr.
Jul 10, 2023
45
Share this post

The Politics of Climate Science

rogerpielkejr.substack.com
18
Share

Share

Leave a comment

Refer a friend

Share The Honest Broker

45
Share this post

The Politics of Climate Science

rogerpielkejr.substack.com
18
Share
Previous
Next
18 Comments
Share this discussion

The Politics of Climate Science

rogerpielkejr.substack.com
Daniel
Jul 16Liked by Roger Pielke Jr.

Hi Roger,

Do you feel comfortable being lumped in with Shellenberger, Lomborg (and Crenshaw?) as the "new movement"? Potential motto: "sure, there is *some* truth to climate change, it is *not nothing*. Just don't be all alarmist about it". Others might say "The New Merchants of Doubt"....

More seriously, though: How can you not see or not care what people like Crenshaw are clearly doing here? Their only aim is to delay climate action domestically, making international cooperation even harder to achieve. It is painfully obvious that Crenshaw was unable to understand the point about 100% of global warming being antropogenic, yet eventually you accomodated to his ultimate obvious intention, which is just to sow doubt on climate change science.

I recognise you have some legitimate academic quibbles, but your love for taking the contrarian view is tragically leading you to cuddle with some really dodgy people. His hypocracy is beyond the pale... complains about subsidies for renewables, but is mute about those for fossil fuels; terribly concerned about energy access in the developing world, but oblivious about the loss and damages of climate change in those same countries. He pretty much recited the fossil fuel industry script agaist renewables .... embarrassing stuff

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
2 replies by Roger Pielke Jr. and others
Mark Silbert
Jul 12

Crenshaw's podcast is always worth a listen. Good job by Roger.

Crenshaw's confusion on the "how much is due to CO2" is easy to understand. From an energy perspective, the real question is how much is due to the CO2 that results from the burning of fossil fuels. I don't have the numbers handy but my recollection is that less than 50% of CO2 emissions come from the burning of fossil fuels. Someone needs to help Crenshaw come up with a nice simple summary of CO2 emissions due to the burning of fossil fuels.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
16 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Roger Pielke Jr.
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing