Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fred Jewett's avatar

So many greenies fail to understand that man will overcome obstacles when they present themselves.

Early warning of obstacles in our life is important so we can be proactive. In support of this I provide the following brief summary of the Ehrlich -Simon wager:

In 1968, Ehrlich published The Population Bomb, which argued that mankind was facing a demographic catastrophe with the rate of population growth quickly outstripping growth in the supply of food and resources. Simon was highly skeptical of such claims, so proposed a wager, telling Ehrlich to select any raw material he wanted and select "any date more than a year away," and Simon would bet that the commodity's price on that date would be lower than what it was at the time of the wager.

Ehrlich and his colleagues picked five metals that they thought would undergo big price increases: chromium, copper, nickel, tin, and tungsten. Then, on paper, they bought $200 worth of each, for a total bet of $1,000, using the prices on September 29, 1980, as an index. They designated September 29, 1990, 10 years hence, as the payoff date. If the inflation-adjusted prices of the various metals rose in the interim, Simon would pay Ehrlich the combined difference. If the prices fell, Ehrlich et al. would pay Simon.

Between 1980 and 1990, the world's population grew by more than 800 million, the largest increase in one decade in all of history. But by September 1990, the price of each of Ehrlich's selected metals had fallen. Chromium, which had sold for $3.90 a pound in 1980, was down to $3.70 in 1990. Tin, which was $8.72 a pound in 1980, was down to $3.88 a decade later.[2]

As a result, in October 1990, Paul Ehrlich mailed Julian Simon a check for $576.07 to settle the wager in Simon's favor.

Expand full comment
Wayne Stoltenberg's avatar

If one’s objective is human flourishing, de-growth is just at odds with that, plain and simple. Machiavelli’s classic 16th century work “The Prince”, talks about how an effective technique for an authoritarian ruler to maintain power is to convince the populace that there is a sever threat from which the ruler will protect them.

The climate catastrophe narrative is looking and smelling a lot like this. Remember, if it looks like a duck and smells like a duck, it’s a duck.

Expand full comment
52 more comments...

No posts